🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.