🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to resume atomic discussions with Washington as long as it is handled with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi stated solely negotiations was effective, and disclosed new appeals had originated from intermediaries to resume discussions with the American leadership. He said Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Iran was not yet able to permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Walking a Difficult Route

Araghchi is navigating a difficult path since Iran does not want appear to be acting from a position of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out stronger in military terms and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material within its borders that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Earlier Talks Abruptly Ended

The earlier sessions of talks between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the US president claiming the facilities had been eliminated. Following this, European countries used their authority to restore global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iranian officials said they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could work inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Officials stated three times they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Present Status

Iran's diplomats stated the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be revived in various formats if discussions reopen.

Trump recently claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Iranian officials say they are not yet getting consistent overtures from the United States either directly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been charged of non-responsiveness in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran states dialogue is not part of a show.

Negotiating Stance

In his speech to the gathering, designed to portray the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the notion of international law, the foreign minister declared the fortnight-long engagement revealed the dispute could not be resolved by armed force. He said the attacks commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with total Washington understanding and coordination, making confidence challenging to reestablish.

Dialogue Remains the Ultimate Answer

The foreign minister declared: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted negotiations; it was the United States and the Western nations that had consistently sought to impose their will during the discussions. Dialogue can still be alive and stays the final solution to resolve disagreements, but its standards, rules and principles must be adhered to."

"If they speak to the nation of Iran with the approach of dignity and respect, they will get a reply in the identical approach."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was certain Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We gained many lessons from this conflict; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He added: "We managed to survive this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to eliminate, continues to exist. The installations and equipment, if eliminated, will be restored; what is important is the will of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but did not succeed to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have become more powerful, more united, and more endorsing of the administration and the nation in the aftermath of this assault."