🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has announced it is pursuing damages amounting to $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step represents a clear response from the Kremlin against plans to utilize immobilized Russian state assets to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to reports in local news outlets, the central bank filed a claim last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion claim.

EU leaders are set to determine later this week on a plan to use approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a large loan to fund its defence and economic stability.

Most of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the primary custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

EU authorities have maintained that their plan is on solid legal ground. Their position rests on the fact that title of the state assets remains with Russia, even though it was immobilized in European jurisdictions shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, in contrast, has called any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened retaliatory measures, including seizing EU corporate assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a key position in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its funds. He warned that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan.

Wider Implications

With statements seen as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the proposal as "a vicious assault on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. The institution has previously noted it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

While judges in European nations are unlikely to recognize judgments from Russian courts, experts anticipate Moscow to seek implementation in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that relevant holdings can be located," commented a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities said they are developing measures to deter other countries from assisting any Russian lawsuits against European companies. They are also crafting protections to protect EU countries with assets in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the detailed scheme, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay unaffected.

Ukraine would solely be obligated to return the money in the event that Russia consented to pay reparations for the vast destruction caused during the ongoing conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an alternative approach for funding Ukraine. This entails joint EU debt issuance to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the EU budget.

Such a proposal, however, requires full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, said the reparations loan as "the most credible option" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, meaning it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she stated. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear message that when you do all this damage to another country, you must pay for the rebuilding."