🔗 Share this article

Iturns out he was able to withstand losing against Grimsby. Survive losing a crucial European final against one of the worst Spurs sides for many years. He could survive home defeats against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, squandering some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight right-back during Blackburn Rovers' championship 1994-95 season, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers will notice the irony here: a coach who frequently berated at his players for losing one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of a England's top division's most feared football executives.

In truth, this whole bruising episode appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, given his nine months in a similar role with the Saints, to regard him as little more than a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that the club's competitors will now be rightly wary.

A Strategic Clash Over Formation & Philosophy

For example, this was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. However, these judgements carry more weight when delivered from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a role in a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause activated. The director seldom speaks publicly, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – men like him – function on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite the same as being ready to receive.

The Ultimate Power Behind Command

Naturally, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we are obscuring the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his superior the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to adopt data science and analytics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach to football “will be determined by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate football matters, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are the best of us: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, fundamentally superior. Whom else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

A New Football Order: Directors Above Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once possible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and drive to go into a club and see their vision through to completion. But how many companies have these guys set up? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. Better by far to determine the strategy by the directors and hire a coach who will adapt their methods accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they have become more akin to delivery personnel: not creating the product, but still finally accountable should it be delivered cold or fails of the box.

In the meantime, their job has become less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of literal children into Europe and secures domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged whereas those individuals who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Game: Accountability for the Coaches

And possibly on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance in action: the rise of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss them for using too much that system. Hire the process guy and then discard him for requiring excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.